热门搜索:  少年

薛平贵与王宝钏

泰顺考察团走进滨江 跨越山海赴“文明之约”_我的网站

会痛的十七岁

一 |     COLUMBUS, Ohio -- With Election Day closing in, anti-abortion groups seeking to build opposition to a reproductive rights measure in Ohio are messaging heavily around a term for an abortion procedure that was once used later in pregnancy — but hasn't been legal in the U.S. for over 15 years.In ads, debates and public statements, the opposition campaign and top Republicans have increasingly been referencing “partial-birth abortions” as an imminent threat if voters approve the constitutional amendment on Nov. 7. “Partial-birth abortion” is a non-medical term for a procedure known as dilation and extraction, or D&X, which is already federally prohibited.“It would allow a partial-birth abortion,” Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine told reporters recently as he explained his opposition to the constitutional amendment, known as Issue 1. “For many years, in Ohio and in this country, we’ve had a law that said a partial-birth abortion — where the child is partially delivered and then killed and then finally delivered — was illegal in Ohio,” the governor continued. “This constitutional amendment would override that.” Constitutional scholars say that is not true and that the amendment would not override the existing federal ban if Ohio voters approve it.“So changing our constitution will not affect in the slightest way the applicability of the federal partial-birth abortion ban,” said Dan Kobil, a law professor at Capital University in Columbus, who supports abortion rights. “It would be a federal crime for a doctor to violate that ban."That's because the supremacy clause of the U.S. Constitution calls for federal laws to trump state laws, said Jonathan Entin, professor emeritus of law at Case Western State University.“If the federal law prohibits a particular technique, then that’s going to prevail over a state law that might be inconsistent,” he said.Ohio is the only state this November where voters will decide whether abortion should be legal. But the debate isn’t happening in isolation. The state has been used as a campaign testing ground by anti-abortion groups after a string of defeats since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned a constitutional right to the procedure. And next year, abortion rights supporters are planning to put the question before voters in several more states, ensuring the issue will be central to races up and down the ballot.A D&X procedure involved dilating the woman’s cervix, then pulling the fetus through the cervix, feet-first to the neck. The head was then punctured and the skull emptied and compressed to allow the fetus to fit through the dilated cervix. Before the federal ban, it was used for both abortions and miscarriages in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy.DeWine was serving in the U.S. Senate when the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act was passed in 2003. He voted for the prohibition, which declared a “moral, medical, and ethical consensus” that the procedure was “gruesome and inhumane.” President George W. Bush signed the measure into law with DeWine at his side.The ban was largely on hold while a constitutional challenge played out. The U.S. Supreme Court in 2007 rejected arguments against the law, upholding its application across all 50 states.Asked why the governor suggested a federal law he supported would not apply if Ohio changes its constitution, spokesman Dan Tierney said DeWine bases his position on provisions of the U.S. Constitution that prevent the federal government from regulating conduct that has no effect on interstate commerce. Kobil acknowledged that argument, but said it’s “almost certain to fail” if tested, given that the Supreme Court already declared the ban constitutional.DeWine isn't the only top elected Republican in the state to warn that the procedure would be revived if the amendment passes on Nov. 7.In a memo earlier this month, Republican Attorney General Dave Yost said the state’s laws outlawing abortions through D&X and another procedure, non-intact dilation and evacuation, or D&E, the most common second trimester method, “would both be invalidated and these abortions would be permitted” if the amendment passes. The Ohio Senate’s Republican supermajority passed a resolution saying something similar.Entin, of Case Western, said “to the extent that the Ohio laws he’s discussed are also covered by the federal law, it doesn’t matter,” because federally banned procedures would remain illegal.Kelsey Pritchard, director of state public affairs for Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America, whose political arm is a major funder of the campaign opposing the amendment, said the federal ban “lacks enforcement” under a Biden Administration she described as “extreme pro-abortion.”“If it's not being enforced, if there's no teeth to it, then the protections need to happen at the state level,” argued spokesperson Amy Natoce of Protect Women Ohio, the Issue 1 opposition campaign. “Of course, if Issue 1 passed, we won't have those protections.”Mae Winchester, a Cleveland-based maternal fetal medicine specialist, said use of the term in the campaign messaging over the amendment is misleading.“‘Partial-birth abortion’ is a made-up term that only serves to create confusion and stigmatize abortion later in pregnancy,” she said. “It’s not a procedure that’s described anywhere in medical literature, and so it’s not considered a medical term or even an actual medical procedure.”Ohio passed the nation's first ban on what its lawmakers then dubbed “partial birth feticide” in 1995, just three years after Ohio physician Martin Haskell debuted the D&X procedure during an abortion practitioners conference. He touted it as a way to avoid an overnight hospital stay and as safer and less painful for women than other methods. Protect Women Ohio has invoked Haskell’s legacy in one of its ads. It shows an image of Haskell and describes the procedure he pioneered as “painful for the mother and the baby.” The voiceover then calls for a no vote on the amendment “so people like Dr. Haskell can't perform painful ‘late-term’ abortions.”The spot doesn’t note the distinction between “partial-birth” and “late-term” abortions — both non-medical terms coined by anti-abortion advocates — nor reference the federal ban.Mike Gonidakis, president of Ohio Right to Life, said because of protections provided to individuals and abortion providers in the amendment, “The ad withstands any scrutiny.”Haskell retired from active practice two years ago. He declined comment. But he has donated to the main group supporting the constitutional amendment, Ohioans United for Reproductive Rights.Pro-Choice Ohio Executive Director Kellie Copeland called talk of “late-term” and “partial-birth” abortions a scare tactic.“Issue 1 allows for clear restrictions on abortion after viability that protect patients’ health and safety,” she said. “These situations, when a woman needs an abortion later in pregnancy, are incredibly rare and heartbreaking for families.” Ohio hasn’t had an abortion of any type performed after 25 weeks’ gestation since 2018 and only four have been recorded since 2013, according to statistics compiled by the state Health Department. Abortions between 21 and 24 weeks’ gestation, a span that encompasses the outside limit of Ohio’s current law, totaled 576, or 0.6% of the total, over that time.Pritchard, of Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America, attributed the low numbers to the state's existing abortion restrictions.___Associated Press reporter Christine Fernando in Chicago contributed to this report.。    文明是什么?近日,在滨江区新时代文明实践中心(以下简称“实践中心”),来自温州市泰顺县的考察团一行20余人,找到了另一种答案——不是挂在墙上的制度,而是一座城的独特气质,是嵌入每一天的生活方式。实践中心建于2021年、占地5000平方米的四层空间,依托系统化的运行机制、全龄段的功能阵地、品牌化的实践活动,涵盖理论宣讲、红色教育、文化传承、未成年人活动等多元场景,让可感、可触、可参与的新时代文明实践融入群众日常。而就在半个月前,滨江、泰顺两地在泰顺正式签订精神文明建设共建结对协议,这场跨越山海的实地探访,正是“文明之约”从纸面落到地面的一场生动实践。在实践中心,考察团还邂逅了一群特殊的“志愿者”——来自宇树科技的人形机器人“小滨”与机器狗“小新”化身“科技导游”,引领大家步入这座现代化的文明空间。步入中心广场,一场集市盛宴正热闹上演。集市既展示了编织灯笼、蓝印花布印染等非遗技艺,又提供了磨刀、缝补、义诊等便民服务。考察团从科技、文化与民生的多维角度,深刻感受到了滨江文明实践的独特魅力。

二 | 考察团边走边看,详细了解实践中心“四级书记主抓、专业队伍赋能、数字平台管理、品牌活动联动”的一体化运作机制。如果说实践中心回答了“文明在哪”的问题,长河街道星光产业社区会客厅则展示了“文明如何服务人”。作为滨江首个实体运行的商务楼宇型产业社区,这里跳出传统政务大厅模式,立足“产城人”深度融合,把文明建设深度融入企业发展、人才服务和基层治理全过程。“我们这里见证了不少年轻人的爱情。”社区负责人向考察团介绍道,自2024年入选“滨江区甜蜜经济示范点位”以来,这里已累计服务3500余人次,举办相亲交友活动44场。“把服务做到企业和年轻人的心坎上,文明的底色自然就亮了。”“这里是‘最美现象’的发源地。”长河街道闻涛社区工作人员介绍说,从“最美妈妈”吴菊萍到“最美司机”吴斌,许多“最美”故事曾从这里传遍全国。全国五四红旗团支部、浙江省文明单位、浙江省四星级“侨胞之家”……一连串荣誉背后,是“最美”精神在楼道里、在邻里间、在日常生活中的持续生长。一位考察团代表感慨:“滨江的文明既有科技温度、服务精度,也有人文厚度。”滨江与泰顺自2021年7月结对以来,在产业协作上已结出累累硕果,累计完成产业合作项目49个,完成固定资产投资32.65亿元。

三 | 如今,这份山海情谊从产业协同延伸至文明共建,让“双向奔赴”的内涵更加丰富。

Current article:http://www.shangfochengcongshuaizhuang.buzz/3funpi/35w.pptx

Published on:15:26:44