名下多出15台车足协评议：新鹏城短暂9打11符合竞赛规则，但裁判组程序存在不足_我的网站
一 |  Germany's industrial woes have increasingly become a hot topic of discussion. The latest Engineer Monitor report from professional association Verein Deutscher Ingenieure and the German Economic Institute offers a new look at the issue. The report showed that there were 58,392 unemployed individuals in the engineering and information technology (IT) professions in the fourth quarter of 2025, the highest level since the survey began in 2011. Compared with the previous year, the number of unemployed increased by 16.7 percent, according to German media reports on Sunday. These figures lay bare the challenges confronting the country's manufacturing sector. The reasons for the industrial woes are multiple. The soaring energy costs caused by geopolitical conflicts, the decline in exports caused by rising protectionism and low external demand, and the structural pain caused by industrial chain restructuring are all squeezing the space of German manufacturing. Manufacturing is the backbone of Germany's economy, and engineers and IT specialists constitute the core force that sustains this pillar. For decades, the country's reputation for "Made in Germany" excellence was built on the expertise of these skilled professionals. Regardless of the macroeconomic ups and downs, preserving the stability and continuity of its industrial talent pool represents a strategic bottom line for Germany. Should large numbers of highly skilled technical professionals leave the industry or sit idle, industrial research and development (R&D) and production cycles will be disrupted. Over the longer term, such a waste of human capital will erode Germany's industrial innovation capacity and, ultimately, undermine the foundations of its global competitiveness. In this context, the urgent task for Germany is to create sufficient quality positions for its technical talent. Should it fail to do so in the short term, then Germany needs to embrace a more open‑minded development approach. Shoring up its manufacturing base cannot be achieved solely through protecting domestic companies; it also requires a significant expansion of effective investment to create enough high‑quality jobs that can attract and retain skilled talent. This is exactly where China‑Germany cooperation could deliver tangible results. According to the FDI Report 2025 published by Germany Trade & Invest (GTAI), the total number of foreign investment projects in Germany fell 9.3 percent overall to 1,564 in 2025. Nonetheless, Chinese companies became the largest source of foreign investment projects in Germany in 2025, overtaking the US for the first time since 2017. Chinese companies launched 228 investment projects in Germany in 2025, up 14.6 percent year-on-year. More than one in five Chinese investment projects involved production and R&D activities, above the overall average for foreign investment projects in Germany. This is a sign that Chinese firms are deepening their integration into the local industrial base, according to GTAI. Observers noted the trend, pointing out that China is becoming an important force in driving German re‑industrialization. In industries where Germany urgently needs to rebuild its competitive edge, such as electric vehicles, batteries, energy technology, digital manufacturing, and automation, China is emerging as an increasingly significant complementary partner. In these critical areas that will determine industrial competitiveness in the coming decades, the relationship between China and Germany is not merely one of rivalry; there are clear and substantial complementarities. Germany still boasts world‑leading engineering expertise, precision manufacturing capabilities, and a strategic location at the heart of the European market. China has complete and highly integrated supply chains for raw materials and intermediate goods and large capacity for increasing production. When Chinese automakers set up R&D centers in Germany, or when Chinese tech firms collaborate with German factories to build smart production lines, the beneficiaries are not only the Chinese companies but also the German engineers who would otherwise face redundancy. Cross‑border investment cannot flourish without a sound policy environment. Chinese companies are apparently willing to develop in Germany, but it can only happen on the premise that the German side provides a fair, reasonable and predictable business environment, reduces non-market interference in commercial activities, and allows capital to operate in accordance with market rules. If the two countries are able to reach a deeper level of cooperation in investment, many of Germany's trade‑related concerns may well find more pragmatic solutions. The deep integration of industrial value chains would facilitate two‑way trade, creating renewed momentum for German exports of machinery, vehicles, chemicals, and other competitive products to China. 。 08月26日讯 中国足协发布新一期裁判评议，对裁判组处理深圳新鹏城队替换队员事件作出说明。指出新鹏城场上9打11丢球事件符合竞赛规则，但裁判组程序处理上存在不足。【相关】新鹏城申诉函内容：四官拒绝受理换人申请，球队场上仅有9人作战 【判例内容】判例七：中超联赛第24轮，深圳新鹏城vs浙江俱乐部绿城。比赛第80分钟，深圳新鹏城替换队员，因替换下场的11号队员未在10秒内离场，造成替换上场的17号队员暂时不能上场，之后深圳新鹏城15号队员受伤下场，未能作出替换。随后比赛恢复，深圳新鹏城场上队员暂时为9人，深圳新鹏城踢直接任意球恢复比赛后，浙江俱乐部绿城队得到控球权，发起进攻并取得进球。
二 | 裁判员判进球有效。深圳新鹏城俱乐部申诉意见认为：本队在队员受伤后，已提交换人申请，但第四官员拒绝执行换人程序，导致本方在只有9名场上队员的情况下，被对方进球。对于此判例，经调查和了解现场情况，评议组作出如下认定和说明：第一，深圳新鹏城17号替换11号时，因后者未能在10秒限时内离开比赛场地，按照竞赛规则，替换上场的17号暂时不能上场，需在比赛恢复后再经过1分钟，之后的首次比赛停止时，得到裁判员的示意，方可上场。第二，在比赛恢复前，深圳新鹏城15号受伤倒地，随后由担架抬出场地。在此过程中，深圳新鹏城再次提出替换申请，由6号和25号，替换场上的2号和受伤的15号。第四官员未执行替换前的有关检查。
三 | 此时比赛具备恢复条件，裁判员决定恢复比赛，该程序并不违反竞赛规则。球队提出替换申请，并不意味着替换程序即刻开始，第四官员必须先进行一系列检查核对程序（包括检查核对替换单据、换人牌、本场报名名单、确认队员号码和参赛资格、检查替补队员装备等），所有程序就绪后，才可通知裁判员，并在比赛停止时进行替换。在上述检查完成前，如果比赛具备继续或恢复的条件，裁判员应先允许比赛继续或恢复。
四 | 第三，此判例中，在深圳新鹏城15号受伤倒地时，比赛已具备恢复条件。
五 | 但裁判员因深圳新鹏城15号受伤而延迟比赛恢复，此时如果球队提出替换申请，并且递交资料齐备，从管理角度出发，第四官员应优先启动替换前的检查程序（无论是否能够在比赛恢复前完成替换），其次再兼顾（或由其他比赛官员兼顾）暂不允许上场的深圳新鹏城17号的管理与计时（如果比赛恢复）。
六 | 综上，此判例中，比赛在深圳新鹏城场上暂时只有9名队员时恢复，符合竞赛规则。但裁判组在比赛管理和工作程序处理上存在不足。 Current article:http://www.shangfochengcongshuaizhuang.buzz/hf49/4ydb.docx Published on:15:21:54 |
