天眼查

葡萄牙记者：尽管现在的穆里尼奥年岁渐长，但他的本质依然未变_我的网站

A |     

    A busy scene at the Port of Shanghai on July 24, 2026 Photo: VCG
China's rapid rise in innovation capabilities has drawn broad recognition and positive assessments from the international community. However, some have taken a different stance, expressing concerns over China's technological and industrial advancement and even promoting the so-called "China Shock 2.0" narrative for various reasons, including the unfounded claim that China's industrial development is limiting others' growth opportunities.
A closer look reveals why this narrative does not hold up, for two fundamental reasons.
First, this narrative deliberately overlooks the inclusive, open and empowering nature of China's innovation.
China has always been a committed practitioner, active promoter, and major contributor to global economic, trade and technological cooperation. Through technological advancement and industrial upgrading, China has not only developed itself, but also provided the world with an increasing number of "innovation dividends."
For instance, digital economy, technological innovations in areas such as artificial intelligence applications, mobile payments and e-commerce have provided developing countries with valuable pathways for digital transformation. In the green energy sector, advances in China's photovoltaic, wind power and new energy vehicle industries have directly driven down the global cost of renewable energy, offering affordable solutions for countries tackling climate change. In consumer markets, high-quality, efficient, and cost-effective Chinese products have expanded global supply, reduced living costs and helped ease inflationary pressures worldwide.
Moreover, fast-growing Chinese innovation-driven companies have delivered returns of several times or even dozens of times for investors from around the world. 
Companies from around the world can quickly find partners in China across the entire innovation chain, from research and development (R&D) and pilot production to mass manufacturing, making the commercialization of innovation more efficient.
They have not only succeeded in the Chinese market, but also strengthened their competitiveness globally. Facts have demonstrated that China's emerging technologies and products bring opportunities rather than shocks, and empowerment rather than threats to the world.
Second, it ignores the fundamental trends of technological innovation and the underlying dynamics of industrial evolution.
China's innovation has been built through years of strengthening its own capabilities. In recent years, the country has continued to increase investment in research and development, with its R&D spending ranking second globally. 
Funding for basic research has reached a record high as a share of total R&D expenditure, while its pool of scientific and technological talent continues to expand. Through closer collaboration between the scientific community and industries, China has made rapid technological progress, driven continuous industrial upgrading and taken a leading position in some fields.
Innovation-driven development inevitably fuels industrial transformation and the dynamic reshaping of global production capacity, which is a natural outcome of international industrial division and cooperation. 
For example, after years of technological accumulation, China has seized the opportunities created by the global green transition and developed competitive strengths in the "new trio" industries - new energy vehicles, lithium batteries and photovoltaic products - which have gained growing popularity in global markets. Portraying China's industrial upgrading as a "shock" is, in essence, a rejection of the broader historical trend of economic globalization.
"Innovation dividends" represent a positive-sum game, as the benefits of technological progress ultimately serve humanity. Distorting China's technological and industrial innovation and promoting the so-called "China Shock 2.0" narrative reflect outdated zero-sum thinking in some countries, while also revealing attempts to use criticism of China as a pretext to further advance protectionist policies.
Cutting through the rhetoric of protectionism, it becomes clear that the so-called "China Shock 2.0" narrative and "China overcapacity" claims are politically driven narratives that are detached from reality and lack factual basis.
Over the past decade, China has remained a major engine of global economic growth, contributing around 30 percent to global growth. In the past, China mainly provided the world with "market dividends" through its vast domestic market and cost advantages. Today, while continuing to offer greater "market dividends," China has also created "development dividends" by serving as a stable anchor and important hub for global industrial cooperation through its industrial growth. It is also providing the world with increasing "innovation dividends" through technological advancement.
China's market advantages, industrial development and technological progress are generating growing "market dividends," "development dividends" and "innovation dividends." These benefits, working together and reinforcing one another, are creating greater development opportunities and broader space for the world, offering a key perspective for understanding "China Opportunity 2.0."
Amid a complex and volatile international landscape and slowing global economic growth, innovation has become a crucial pathway to counter downward pressures and generate new growth momentum. Addressing global growth challenges requires greater cooperation in innovation. Rather than spending efforts on crafting the "China Shock 2.0" narrative, some countries should focus on domestic structural reforms and enhance their industrial competitiveness through openness and cooperation.
Embracing China means embracing the future. By using technological innovation to drive industrial innovation, China is accelerating the development of new quality productive forces. At the same time, China continues to expand high-level opening-up and provide new opportunities for the world through its own development. A more open and innovation-driven China will continue to deliver greater development dividends and work with countries around the world to build a more prosperous future.
This was compiled and translated by the Global Times English edition based on an article published in the "Chisu Jinsheng" economic commentary column of the People's Daily on August 7, 2026.
。    8月26日讯 据塞尔电台报道，对阵皇家社会的比赛，将是穆里尼奥时隔13年后再次在伯纳乌球场执教。他此次回归皇马所呈现出的形象，与人们记忆中他上一次执教时的样子大相径庭。他显得更加沉稳，不再那么咄咄逼人——这或许是岁月与阅历沉淀后的成熟，他甚至能与当年曾发生过激烈冲突的记者们开玩笑了。然而，曾亲眼见证这位来自塞图巴尔的主帅执教本菲卡时期的葡萄牙记者路易斯·克里斯托旺，却对这个所谓的“新穆里尼奥”持谨慎态度。这位记者被问到了一个直截了当的问题：穆里尼奥在这13年间真的改变了吗？“与早期的那个他相比，是的，他变了。

B | 他经历了许多风雨，在某种程度上也曾远离世界足坛的顶级舞台，而如今他又重返其中，”这位葡萄牙记者解释道。他还指出，目前在皇马训练基地（巴尔德贝巴斯）发生的一切，与当年他在葡萄牙的情形如出一辙。“当年他刚到本菲卡时，我们也有完全相同的感觉。他看起来变了，像换了个人似的。

C | 他变得更友善、更沉稳，还谈论起那些改变了他的经历，”他解释说。不过，克里斯托旺也发出了明确的警示——这对于那些关键时刻到来、且战绩不尽如人意的情形尤为重要：“但他初来乍到是一回事，而当周围的局势、外界的质疑以及比赛本身变得愈发艰难时，情况就完全不同了。就这一点而言，我想说的是，尽管现在的穆里尼奥年岁渐长，但他的本质依然未变。”身在葡萄牙的克里斯托旺也感到难以置信：皇马竟然选择在13年后重新请回穆里尼奥执教。

D | “他能重返马德里让我非常惊讶，”他解释道，“因为上赛季离开费内巴切后，我曾说过，他重返里斯本（执教本菲卡）将是他最后的机会。”他补充道：“那是他最后一次机会去执教豪门、征战欧冠并成就一番伟业——在职业生涯临近尾声之际留下属于自己的印记。

E | ”然而，皇马的机会就这样出现了。鉴于种种情况，克里斯托旺对这一任命感到震惊——尤其是考虑到他在里斯本执教本菲卡期间的口碑：“他在那里的表现既不惊艳，也谈不上出色，如今重返马德里简直不可思议。这完全出人意料。”本周三，穆里尼奥将重返伯纳乌，面对一个截然不同的主场环境。然而，或许他自己却依然如故，未曾改变。

Current article:http://www.shangfochengcongshuaizhuang.buzz/list_59um8x/9z7lg3g.ppt

Published on:17:51:34