东京爱情故事

Coupang turns away antitrust inspectors in unprecedented move as FTC chief threatens criminal referral_我的网站

一 |     'DAOL FI PRO'로 미국 주식부터 시작…해외투자·국내투자 잇는 양방향 플랫폼 구축                   [서울=뉴시스] 다올투자증권 여의도 사옥 전경 (사진제공=다올투자증권) 26.03.03. [email protected] *재판매 및 DB 금지[서울=뉴시스]송혜리 기자 = 다올투자증권이 글로벌 전자증권사 인터랙티브 브로커스(IBKR)와 손잡고 국내외를 연결하는 양방향 글로벌 투자 플랫폼을 구축한다.26일 미국 비즈니스 와이어에 따르면 다올투자증권은 최근 IBKR와 전략적 협업을 체결했다. 핵심은 투자 가능한 시장과 상품의 확대다. IBKR은 170개 이상 시장에서 다양한 금융상품을 거래할 수 있는 인프라와 실시간 리스크 관리·모니터링 시스템 등을 제공하고 있다. 다올투자증권은 IBKR의 글로벌 거래 인프라를 활용해, 국내 적격 투자자에게 보다 비용 효율적인 글로벌 주식 투자 서비스를 제공할 계획이다.이를 위한 첫 단계로 다올투자증권은 지난 19일 IBKR 인프라를 활용한 글로벌 트레이딩 플랫폼 'DAOL FI PRO'를 출시했다. 미국 주식 거래를 시작으로 글로벌 시장 접근성을 확대하면서 경쟁력 있는 거래 비용과 체결 환경을 제공한단 계획이다. 데이비드 프리드랜드 IBKR 아시아태평양 총괄 매니징디렉터는 "IBKR의 기술력과 경쟁력 있는 가격, 폭넓은 글로벌 시장 접근성이 금융기관의 업무 효율성을 높이고 투자자에게 더 나은 서비스를 제공하는 데 도움이 될 것"이라고 밝혔다. 이병철 다올투자증권 회장은 "이번 협력은 한국 투자자에게 글로벌 증권 인프라와 직접 연결되는 새로운 투자 경험을 제공하기 위한 것"이라며 "투자 가능 시장 확대와 파생상품, 해외 투자자의 한국시장 직접투자 서비스까지 포괄해 장기적으로 양방향 글로벌 투자 플랫폼으로 발전시킬 계획"이라고 밝혔다.。    Coupang has sued to halt a Fair Trade Commission inspection into whether price-matching coupon costs were shifted to suppliers.                    Coupang trucks are parked near the e-commerce platform's logistics center in Seoul on Dec. 29, 2025. YONHAPCoupang has repelled attempts by inspectors from the antitrust watchdog to launch an on-site inspection over allegations that the e-commerce powerhouse shifted costs to suppliers. In rebuffing the Fair Trade Commission (FTC) officers, the company said that it has not received a legally required notice prior to the inspection. FTC Chairman Ju Biung-ghi said after the failed raid on Wednesday that he will pursue criminal charges.Coupang's refusal to comply with an on-site investigation by the FTC marks the first time since the regulator was established that a company has rejected an inspection outright, in this case on the grounds that "the law was applied improperly."The commission attempted to launch inspections at Coupang on four occasions, from Aug. 19 to Friday and again on Monday, but withdrew each time.Investigators were seeking to determine whether Coupang improperly passed the cost of its "price-matching coupons" on to its suppliers.The coupons are issued automatically when a product sold on the platform is priced higher than on a competing online marketplace, bringing the actual purchase price down to roughly the lowest available. The commission is examining whether the resulting discount costs were shifted onto suppliers.Coupang's argument against the investigation revolves around a notification clause in the law that was not applied. Article 17 of the Framework Act on Administrative Investigations requires an administrative agency, as a general rule, to notify the subject of an on-site inspection in writing at least seven days in advance.                    The Korean headquarters of e-commerce platform Coupang in Songpa District, southern Seoul NEWS1In a statement on Tuesday, Coupang said the notice requirement is "a lawful procedure that guarantees the interests and rights of the party under investigation" and that the company "plans to seek a court ruling on the commission's failure to observe that procedure."However, the same article stipulates that the notice "may be presented to the person subject to investigation simultaneously with the commencement of the administrative investigation or the purposes" when "it is deemed impossible to achieve the purposes of the investigation due to an anticipated destruction of evidence."The commission's position is that the exception applies here because advance notice would have created a risk of evidence destruction. Coupang counters that this investigation does not meet the conditions for the exception.The e-commerce titan argues that the concern is not credible given that it cooperated with other extended on-site inspections at its headquarters by the commission and other government agencies from January, following a massive personal data breach.The outcome now rests with the courts. On Friday, Coupang filed a suit seeking to cancel the commission's decision and disposition authorizing the on-site inspection, along with an injunction to halt the investigation.                    Delivery trucks wait at a Coupang logistics center in Seoul. YONHAP"It is unusual for an on-site inspection by the commission to fall apart because the company under investigation refused it," an industry source told the JoongAng Ilbo. "Depending on the court's decision, the commission's overall practice of conducting on-site inspections without advance notice could be shaken, and other companies under investigation could demand procedural rights the way Coupang has."The ruling liberal Democratic Party sharply criticized Coupang's refusal to comply with the investigation, saying no company can stand above Korean law."Coupang is using claims of discrimination against U.S. companies by the U.S. government and political circles as a shield to evade legitimate domestic regulation and investigation," DP spokesperson Lee Yong-woo said Wednesday in a written statement. "The company's double standard, enjoying enormous profits in the Korean market but invoking its status as a U.S. company only when it is time to take responsibility, is infuriating."。

Current article:http://www.shangfochengcongshuaizhuang.buzz/rap/ctsfo7.html

Published on:15:25:45