时间: 10:33:09 来源: 翻译 作者: 我的网站 点击: 24468
钢铁侠3

铁石心肠

China rejects EU’s ‘unlawful’ extraterritorial overreach in JD.com probe; move signals Beijing’s resolve to safeguard its interests: expert_我的网站

中国银行

A |     

China's Ministry of Justice Photo: VCG
China's Ministry of Justice Photo: VCG
China on Wednesday determined that the EU's cross-border investigative practices targeting Chinese entities in its probe into JD.com under the Foreign Subsidies Regulation (FSR) constituted unlawful extraterritorial jurisdiction, and said it is barring organizations and individuals from implementing or assisting with the measures.
This statement was made by China's Ministry of Justice (MOJ), together with the Ministry of Commerce (MOFCOM) and other relevant departments. The announcement takes effect immediately.
The finding follows an investigation conducted pursuant to Articles 3 and 6 of China's rules on countering foreign states' unlawful extraterritorial jurisdiction measures. No organization or individual may implement or assist in implementing such measures, according to the official WeChat account of the MOJ on Wednesday evening. 
The announcement sends a clear and firm message about China's position on the EU's unilateral measures, and the bloc should carefully weigh the broader implications of pursuing such actions, including the potential costs to its own interests and China-EU economic and trade relations, a Chinese expert said. Continued use of the FSR in this manner could erode investment confidence and further strain bilateral economic ties, the expert noted.
Countering extraterritorial overreach
A spokesperson for China's MOJ on Wednesday blasted the EU's targeting of JD.com, saying the bloc had arbitrarily demanded extensive and unnecessary information located in China from Chinese entities on a cross-border basis. Such demands are improper and constitute a serious violation of the international rule of law, the spokesperson said.
To safeguard China's sovereignty, security and development interests, as well as the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese citizens, legal persons and other organizations, the Ministry of Justice, together with the Ministry of Commerce and other relevant authorities, determined in accordance with rules on countering foreign states' unlawful extraterritorial jurisdiction measures that the EU's actions constituted unlawful extraterritorial jurisdiction. Any organization or individual is therefore prohibited from complying with or assisting in the implementation of the measures, according to the spokesperson.
The MOJ spokesperson urged the EU to immediately correct its wrongful practices, stop abusing the Foreign Subsidies Regulation as an investigative tool, and provide a fair, just and predictable market environment for companies investing and operating in Europe. If the EU persists with such actions, China will take resolute countermeasures in accordance with law, the spokesperson said.
Chinese e-commerce giant JD.com's $2.5 billion bid for German electronics retailer Ceconomy may involve Chinese subsidies, European ‌Union competition regulators claimed, as they opened a full-scale investigation into the deal, Reuters reported on May 28.
The acquisition will allow one of China's largest retailers to expand outside its home market via Ceconomy-owned electronic products retailers MediaMarkt and Saturn, Reuters reported.
The decision by ⁠the European Commission marks its first in-depth probe of a Chinese deal under its so-called FSR.
This marks another time the rules on countering foreign states' unlawful extraterritorial jurisdiction measures have been invoked since they took effect in April.
In May, the MOJ, together with MOFCOM and other relevant departments, determined after an investigation that the EU's cross border investigative practices targeting Chinese entities in its investigation into Nuctech under the FSR constituted unlawful extraterritorial jurisdiction.
The latest announcement concerning the EU's unilateral move under the FSR once again reflects the Chinese government's firm position on safeguarding national sovereignty, security and legitimate rights and interests, while also representing a clear response to the EU's relevant practices, Jian Junbo, director of the Center for China-Europe Relations at Fudan University's Institute of International Studies, told the Global Times on Wednesday.
"The announcement sends a clear signal to the EU and other countries: China will not accept attempts by any country to use its domestic laws as a basis for exercising unlawful extraterritorial jurisdiction over matters within China, particularly when such actions undermine China's sovereign rights and interests," said Jian.
Likewise, China will not accept attempts to unilaterally address economic and trade frictions through so-called legal instruments when doing so harms the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese companies and the Chinese market, Jian said.
Call on fair, just market
The EU's frequent use of the FSR against Chinese companies is not an isolated occurrence.
In February, the European Commission announced an in-depth investigation under the FSR into Chinese wind turbine manufacturer Goldwind.
Responding to the bloc's move, a MOFCOM spokesperson said that the EU had recently frequently used the FSR to launch investigations into Chinese companies and had escalated investigations into Chinese wind power and security equipment companies to in-depth probes, showing clear targeting and discrimination. China has expressed serious concern and strong dissatisfaction over the moves.
The MOFCOM spokesperson said the EU's investigations had broadened the concept of "foreign subsidies" and involved multiple problems, including insufficient evidence to launch investigations and a lack of transparency in procedures, describing the practices as "typical protectionism in the name of 'fair competition.'"
In January 2025, following an investigation, MOFCOM already determined in accordance with the law that the EU's relevant practices constituted trade and investment barriers. Instead of correcting its practices, the EU has gone further down the wrong path.
"China has made its position very clear, and the EU should fully consider the consequences of continuing with such measures, including their potential impact on the EU itself and on China-EU economic and trade relations," Zhang Jian, a vice president of the China Institutes of Contemporary International Relations, told the Global Times on Wednesday.
If the EU continues to impose excessive restrictions on foreign companies through similar rules, it will not only raise compliance costs for multinational companies but could also undermine the competitiveness of European businesses, Zhang said, noting that the EU economy is already facing considerable challenges, while concerns over excessive regulation, bureaucracy and increasingly complex rules have also grown within Europe.
Moreover, such rules may ultimately constrain European companies as well as foreign businesses, experts noted. At a time when the EU economy is facing difficulties, adding more regulation and restrictions instead of addressing underlying problems would be akin to "drinking poison to quench thirst," potentially creating even greater problems for the European economy, Zhang said.
China and the EU are both major global economies. Chinese investment in Europe not only brings capital, but also creates jobs, strengthens supply chains, introduces new technologies and adds vitality to local markets, Jian said.
Moreover, from new-energy vehicles to air conditioners and other consumer products, Chinese companies have brought high-quality, cost-effective products to European consumers, helping meet much-needed market demand while providing consumers with greater choice.
Jian said that as China-EU cross border investment deepens, regulatory frictions are inevitable, but they should be addressed through dialogue and coordination rather than unilateral expansion of extraterritorial jurisdiction. Respect for each other's judicial sovereignty and legal boundaries is essential to stable and predictable economic and trade ties, the expert said.

B |     8月26日讯 北京时间8月28日凌晨3:00,2026/27赛季西甲联赛第1轮(第2轮已提前进行,按赛程本场比赛为第1轮),巴塞罗那将在主场迎战毕尔巴鄂竞技。

C | 赛前,巴萨主帅弗里克出席了新闻发布会,他谈到了球队目前的一些情况。关于巴尔德弗里克:“他是球队的一员。至于明天是否让他上场,我们明天再决定。

D | 我和他谈过,重要的是他要全心全意投入到球队中。他还很年轻,潜力巨大。

E | 我看过他第一个赛季的表现,非常出色。”“他已经有了进步,但还有提升空间。他的心属于巴萨,他的任务就是不断进步。每年都有拉玛西亚的年轻球员渴望获得出场机会。他需要百分之百专注于职业足球,并为巴萨倾尽全力。”关于阿尔瓦雷斯弗里克:“我不想谈论阿尔瓦雷斯,我只想谈谈俱乐部的状况。我们在转会窗口期间完成了一些很棒的引援。俱乐部既要着眼当下,也要考虑未来。我总是追求最好,甚至更好。我对目前的阵容充满信心。俱乐部的工作做得非常出色,因为我们在规划未来的同时也能保持稳定——这正是我们想要的。

F | ”关于利瓦科维奇弗里克:“我们讨论过这个问题——关于主力门将的位置。如果未来几年能拥有一位经验丰富的门将,那将非常棒。

G | 我们对什琴斯尼感到满意,但还得看看接下来几天会发生什么。转会窗口目前仍然开放。”关于向世界冠军致敬弗里克:“我的注意力都在这场比赛上。

H | 那些世界冠军在世界杯上的表现固然精彩,但那已是过去式。我们必须专注于明天的比赛。”关于亚马尔弗里克:“他遇到了一点小问题——头痛。亚马尔是个天才,他休了三周假,恢复训练才没几天。

I | 他没能处于最佳竞技状态是很正常的。我们需要找到方法让他恢复到最佳状态。

J | 我非常看重他踢的那60分钟。他参与了前两个进球:第一个球他参与了前场逼抢,第二个球他送出了一脚直接传球。他每天都在进步。我们需要他。”关于罗德里弗里克:“是的,他能上场。我们计划让他出场。”关于泰尔齐奇弗里克:“我非常了解他。

K | 他曾来巴塞罗那找过我。他是一位执教思路清晰、体系明确的教练,非常适合毕尔巴鄂竞技俱乐部。”关于罗德里与佩德里的搭档组合弗里克:“我们还有贝尔纳尔。罗德里经验更丰富,是一位领袖型球员。如果能与佩德里搭档,我们将能够掌控比赛和球权,这一点至关重要。在对阵埃尔切时,我们丢失了大量球权,但佩德里替补登场后,比赛局势发生了改变——这正是我们所需要的。罗德里是顶尖球员之一,我很期待看到他们俩在巴萨联手,那绝对会是世界级的表现。

L | ”关于加维弗里克:“他目前状况良好——比刚踢完比赛时好多了。

M | 我们还需要再等一周,他才能回归。

N | ”关于防线弗里克“目前,我们对现有的后卫人选感到满意。我们有一些像埃里克·加西亚或孔德这样能胜任多个位置的球员。克里斯滕森和马丁的表现也很出色。库巴西是世界上最好的中后卫之一。鉴于他上赛季以及在世界杯期间的比赛负荷很大,我想对他保持耐心。

o | 我知道他渴望上场,尤其是在经历了一届精彩的世界杯之后。

p | ”再谈亚马尔弗里克:“我不认为他能理解(被换下场)这件事。

q | 但这很正常,因为他渴望出场比赛。作为冠军,人们总是渴望赢得下一个冠军。这就是——也必须是——他的态度。

r | 我队中的所有球员都渴望实现联赛三连冠。我们会为此而战,并努力实现这一目标。”                                    唇枪舌剑、口舌之争?来看主帅赛前争锋。

Current article:http://www.shangfochengcongshuaizhuang.buzz/siwb0u/cr0.html

Published on:06:20:26


本文标签: 小姨多鹤 生死狙击 英雄

回到顶部